| 邢进,袁振东.化学通报,2020,83(3):282-287. |
| 波义耳微粒哲学与道尔顿原子论之比较 |
| The Comparison between Boyle's Corpuscular Philosophy and Dalton's Atomism |
| 投稿时间：2019-10-21 修订日期：2019-12-25 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 波义耳微粒哲学 道尔顿原子论 对比分析 |
| 英文关键词:Boyle's corpuscular philosophy Dalton's atomic theory Contrastive analysis |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2038 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 波义耳微粒哲学与道尔顿原子论是原子论思想发展历程上的两种具有代表性的理论，通过对比二者的思想基础及其时代动因、方法论基础以及对万物本原、物质层次和物质变化原因等的解释，可以发现思想基础在一定程度上决定着科学理论发展的进路，科学进步亦显示时代的发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Boyle's corpuscular philosophy and Dalton's atomism are two representative theories in the development of atomic thought. By comparing the ideological basis and motivation of the times, the methodological basis as well as the reasons for the origin, material level and chemical change of all substances and so on, it can be found that the ideological basis determines the way forward for the development of scientific theory to a certain extent, scientific progress also shows the development of The Times. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |